Former President Trump participates in the first presidential debate at CNN Studios in Atlanta, Georgia, on June 27. (Kyle Mazza/Anadolu via Getty Images)
In a 6-3 decision in the case, the high court sent the matter back down to a lower court, as the justices did not apply the ruling to whether or not former President Trump is immune from prosecution regarding actions related to efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election.
TRUMP IMMUNITY CASE: SUPREME COURT RULES EX-PRESIDENTS HAVE SUBSANTIAL PROTECTION FROM PROSECUTION
Roberts, writing for the majority, said "The President enjoys no immunity for his unofficial acts, and not everything the President does is official.
"The President is not above the law," Roberts continued. "But Congress may not criminalize the President’s conduct in carrying out the responsibilities of the Executive Branch under the Constitution. And the system of separated powers designed by the Framers has always demanded an energetic, independent Executive.
"The President therefore may not be prosecuted for exercising his core constitutional powers, and he is entitled, at a minimum, to a presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts," he added. "That immunity applies equally to all occupants of the Oval Office, regardless of politics, policy, or party."
Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, wrote in a dissenting opinion that "in every use of official power, the President is now a king above the law."
"Let the President violate the law, let him exploit the trappings of his office for personal gain, let him use his official power for evil ends. Because if he knew that he may one day face liability for breaking the law, he might not be as bold and fearless as we would like him to be," she wrote. "That is the majority’s message today.
"Even if these nightmare scenarios never play out, and I pray they never do, the damage has been done," Sotomayor added. "The relationship between the President and the people he serves has shifted irrevocably."
President Biden slammed the Supreme Court's ruling on presidential immunity in Trump v. United States, saying it means there are virtually no limits on what a president can do, in an address Monday evening. (AP/Jacquelyn Martin)
"Respecting the protections that the Constitution provides for the Office of the Presidency secures liberty. In that same vein, the Constitution also secures liberty by separating the powers to create and fill offices," Thomas also said. "And, there are serious questions whether the Attorney General has violated that structure by creating an office of the Special Counsel that has not been established by law."
In her dissenting opinion, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote that she "simply cannot abide the majority’s senseless discarding of a model of accountability for criminal acts that treats every citizen of this country as being equally subject to the law -- as the Rule of Law requires.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
"That core principle has long prevented our Nation from devolving into despotism. Yet the Court now opts to let down the guardrails of the law for one extremely powerful category of citizen: any future President who has the will to flout Congress’s established boundaries," she added.
Fox News’ Brooke Singman contributed to this report.
Greg Norman is a reporter at Fox News Digital.
Get the latest updates from the 2024 campaign trail, exclusive interviews and more Fox News politics content.
Subscribed
You've successfully subscribed to this newsletter!
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/5-key-lines-from-supreme-court-trump-immunity-decision