Director of the FBI James Comey walks to greet U.S. President Donald Trump during the Inaugural Law Enforcement Officers and First Responders Reception in the Blue Room of the White House in Washington, U.S., January 22, 2017. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts - RTSWV23 (REUTERS/Joshua Roberts)
"And we’re executing on all those options," Patel said. "We're not done."
Patel did not elaborate on what that process might entail.
But his remarks are the latest indication that the Trump administration has no plans to stand down on Comey's case, even in the face of what appears to be steep legal hurdles.
Here's what we know about the dismissal of Comey's criminal case and what obstacles the Trump administration might face in efforts to revive it.
Comey was indicted in September on one count of allegedly lying to Congress during testimony before a Senate subcommittee in 2020 and one count of obstruction stemming from the same event.
Trump announced days earlier that Halligan would be heading up the Eastern District of Virginia to replace interim U.S. Attorney Erik Siebert. Siebert resigned under pressure to indict Comey and New York Attorney General James, as Fox News and other outlets previously reported.
Comey's lawyers quickly filed two motions to dismiss his criminal case, including on the grounds that Lindsey Halligan, the interim U.S. attorney and former White House aide who presented the case to a grand jury, was unlawfully appointed.
That question was reviewed by U.S. District Judge Cameron Currie, an outside district judge who ultimately sided with Comey's lawyers on the matter.
"Because Ms. Halligan had no lawful authority to present the indictment, I will grant Mr. Comey’s motion and dismiss the indictment," Currie said.
JAMES COMEY SEEKS TO DISMISS HIS CRIMINAL CASE, CITING 'VINDICTIVE' PROSECUTION
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia is seen in Alexandria, Va. (Photo by Bonnie Cash/Getty Images) ((Bonnie Cash/Getty Images))
Comey's lawyers filed not one, but two motions to dismiss his criminal case. The second filing seeks to do so as a result of what Comey's lawyers argued is "vindictive" and selective prosecution by the Justice Department.
"President Trump ordered the Department of Justice to prosecute Mr. Comey because of personal spite and because Mr. Comey has frequently criticized the president for his conduct in office," Comey's lawyers, Patrick Fitzgerald and Jessica Carmichael, said in the motion to dismiss, filed in late October.
The motion ticks through the years-long, strained relationship between Trump and his onetime FBI director, which Comey's lawyers said bolsters their claim that the indictment "arises from multiple glaring constitutional violations and an egregious abuse of power by the federal government."
Unlike the motion to dismiss the case based on the unlawfulness of Halligan's appointment, which was reviewed by an outside judge, Comey's motion to dismiss was slated to be heard by U.S. District Judge Michael Nachmanoff, the district judge assigned to Comey's case.
It would be expected to come into play immediately, should an appeals court reverse Currie's ruling, since the motions to dismiss must be reviewed by a court before the start of a criminal trial.
It would also almost certainly involve witness testimony from Trump officials with knowledge of the case to speak to what steps the administration took in the run-up to Comey's indictment, the timing of the charges brought against him, and who in the administration ordered certain actions.
MAURENE COMEY SUES DOJ FOR 'UNLAWFUL' FIRING, DEMANDS REINSTATEMENT
Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel are seen at a press conference. (Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images)
Lawyers for Comey asked Judge Nachmanoff to dismiss the case with prejudice — an outcome that, if granted, would block the government from seeking to re-indict Comey for the same actions.
Still, it is notoriously difficult to have a case tossed on the grounds of selective or vindictive prosecution, and in order to do so, Comey's legal team must prove to the court both that prosecutors were acting with genuine animus in bringing the case against him — and that prosecutors singled him out because of that animus.
Still, his lawyers presented an abundance of evidence in their filing that they argued satisfies that burden, and which primarily includes statements and admissions made by Trump and by senior administration officials.
"Objective evidence establishes that President Trump directed the prosecution of Mr. Comey in retaliation for Mr. Comey’s public criticisms and to punish Mr. Comey because of personal spite," his lawyers said.
Short of outright dismissal, the next steps would be expected to involve additional discovery and an evidentiary hearing.
In the meantime, Bondi told reporters that Halligan will also remain in her post at the U.S. attorney's office for the Eastern District of Virginia.
As of this writing, neither the Trump administration nor Comey's lawyers seem to think the case is mooted.
Comey's lawyers vowed to continue the fight after his case was dismissed: "We will continue to challenge any further politically motivated charges through every lawful means available," Comey's lawyer, Abbe Lowell, said in a statement last week.
And Comey himself also weighed in on the matter in a video posted last week to social media.
Trump "will probably come after me again, and my attitude’s going to be the same," Comey said, shortly after his case was dismissed. "I’m innocent. I am not afraid. And I believe in an independent federal judiciary."
Senior Trump administration officials have said much of the same.
"This will not be the final word on this matter," White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said last week.
And Patel, for his part, suggested in the interview on Saturday that the Trump administration is readying "multiple" responses, which could come sooner than later.
As for timing, Patel said to "stay tuned for right after Thanksgiving," though he declined to elaborate further, due to what he said was the appeals court process.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The FBI did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment on Patel's remarks, or on next steps in Comey's case.
Breanne Deppisch is a national politics reporter for Fox News Digital covering the Trump administration, with a focus on the Justice Department, FBI and other national news. She previously covered national politics at the Washington Examiner and The Washington Post, with additional bylines in Politico Magazine, the Colorado Gazette and others. You can send tips to Breanne at Breanne.Deppisch@fox.com, or follow her on X at @breanne_dep.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-admin-vows-move-quickly-comey-case-setbacks-what-know