GOP blasts ‘false' racism claims after judges block Texas redistricting plan

Federal judges block Texas GOP redistricting plan, sparking Republican backlash over racial gerrymandering claims as case heads to Supreme Court.

Ken Paxton, Texas attorney general, during the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on July 16, 2024. (Hannah Beier/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

The redistricting in Texas is part of a push by the president and Republicans to pad the GOP's razor-thin House majority to keep control of the chamber in the 2026 midterms, when the party in power traditionally faces political headwinds and loses seats.

"The public perception of this case is that it's about politics," U.S. District Judge Jeffrey V. Brown, a Trump appointee, said in the majority opinion, joined by U.S. District Judge David Guaderrama, an Obama appointee. 

"To be sure, politics played a role in drawing the 2025 map," the judges said. "But it was much more than just politics. Substantial evidence shows that Texas racially gerrymandered the 2025 map."

HOUSE DEM, 79, INDICATES HE MAY NOT RETIRE AFTER JUDGES STRIKE DOWN TEXAS CONGRESSIONAL MAP

Judge Jerry Smith, a Reagan appointee, dissented without offering an explanation.

The distinction between political and racial motivations for redistricting is crucially important. That's because of a Supreme Court ruling that emphasizes states cannot allow race to be the main reason for redrawing district lines. But the ruling gives states a green light when it comes to political motivations.

Paxton is appealing the ruling, which will head to the Supreme Court.

And Republican Gov. Greg Abbott also sharply criticized the ruling, saying in a statement that Texas legislators "redrew our congressional maps to better reflect Texans' conservative voting preferences — and for no other reason."

"Any claim that these maps are discriminatory is absurd and unsupported by the testimony offered during 10 days of hearings," Abbott argued.

TRUMP TARGETS RED STATE REPUBLICANS IN PUSH TO REDRAW CONGRESSIONAL MAPS

But the ruling suggested that in calling on Texas state lawmakers to draw new maps, the governor pointed to a Justice Department letter that alleged the state's existing 2021 congressional map was unconstitutional because of the racial makeup of certain districts.

The judges' opinion argued that by pointing to that letter, Abbott had "explicitly directed the Legislature to redistrict based on race."

Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during an election night press conference at a California Democratic Party office on Nov. 4, 2025, in Sacramento. (Godofredo A. Vásquez/AP Photo)

Illinois and Maryland, two blue states, and Virginia, where Democrats control the legislature, are also taking steps or seriously considering redistricting.

And in a blow to Republicans, a Utah district judge last week rejected a congressional district map drawn up by the state's GOP-dominated legislature and instead approved an alternate that will create a Democratic-leaning district ahead of next year's elections.

Republicans see hypocrisy in the ruling in Texas.

"Both parties are redistricting to increase their political advantages, but only one party is being accused of doing it for nefarious reasons. It's a double standard and I think most voters can see that," veteran Republican strategist and communicator Ryan Williams told Fox News Digital. "The parties are simply trying to increase their representation in Congress."

And while Trump, to date, hasn't weighed in on the ruling, Attorney General Pam Bondi predicted an eventual victory for Republicans.

"Texas’s map was drawn the right way for the right reasons," she said on X. "We look forward to Texas’s victory at the Supreme Court."

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The Texas ruling comes as the Supreme Court is actively weighing states' use of race in the drawing of congressional maps. Justices heard a second round of oral arguments last month in Louisiana v. Callais, a case centered on that very issue. 

A majority of the court seemed poised to significantly weaken a key Voting Rights Act provision that prohibits states from diluting the power of minority voters, though the court has not yet issued a final ruling. 

Paul Steinhauser is a politics reporter based in the swing state of New Hampshire. He covers the campaign trail from coast to coast."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/republicans-push-back-over-false-accusations-racism-blockbuster-redistricting-fight