Federal judges acknowledge court ruling errors tied to staffers’ AI use after Grassley inquiry

Two federal judges admitted that staff members used artificial intelligence to draft court orders with errors, prompting calls for stronger judicial AI policies and oversight.

The judges' admissions came in response to an inquiry by Sen. Chuck Grassley. (Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

The judges both said they have since adopted measures to improve how rulings are reviewed before they are posted.

Neals said in his letter that a June 30 draft decision in a securities lawsuit "was released in error – human error – and withdrawn as soon as it was brought to the attention of my chambers."

The judge said a law school intern used OpenAI's ChatGPT to perform legal research without authorization or disclosure that he also said was contrary to the chamber's policy and relevant law school policy.

"My chamber's policy prohibits the use of GenAI in the legal research for, or drafting of, opinions or orders," Neals wrote. "In the past, my policy was communicated verbally to chamber's staff, including interns. That is no longer the case. I now have a written unequivocal policy that applies to all law clerks and interns."

FEDERAL JUDGE FINES, REPRIMANDS LAWYER WHO USED AI TO DRAFT COURT FILINGS

Sen. Chuck Grassley had asked the judges to explain whether AI was used in the decisions after lawyers raised concerns about factual inaccuracies and other errors. (Photo by SUSAN WALSH/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

"Honesty is always the best policy. I commend Judges Wingate and Neals for acknowledging their mistakes and I’m glad to hear they’re working to make sure this doesn’t happen again," Grassley said in a statement.

"Each federal judge, and the judiciary as an institution, has an obligation to ensure the use of generative AI does not violate litigants’ rights or prevent fair treatment under the law," the senator continued. "The judicial branch needs to develop more decisive, meaningful and permanent AI policies and guidelines. We can’t allow laziness, apathy or overreliance on artificial assistance to upend the Judiciary’s commitment to integrity and factual accuracy. As always, my oversight will continue."

Lawyers have also faced scrutiny from judges across the country over accusations of AI misuse in court filings. In response, judges have issued fines or other sanctions in several cases over the past few years.

Reuters contributed to this report.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/federal-judges-acknowledge-court-ruling-errors-tied-staffers-ai-use-after-grassley-inquiry